Ich hatte Facebook als eine Art Tagebuch für Notizen und Kommentare zur Zeitgeschichte (halt das, was mich interessiert, hauptsächlich beruflich) schon fast abgeschrieben, weil der Feed über die Jahre immer unübersichtlicher und von sinnloser Werbung bzw. Vorschlägen durchsetzt wurde.
Aber die Exportoption plus eine Zusammenstellung der relevanten Posts und Kommentare (in meinem Fall: political & social science commentary) und zusammenfassende Auswertung über AI (hier: ChatGPT) funktioniert dann doch erstaunlich gut.
Ich lade die Zusammenfassung hier einmal hoch, falls diese Art der Nutzung von Facebook für andere relevant sein könnte (sieh unten).
Was fehlt und wofür ich Facebook ursprünglich vor allem genutzt habe ist ein Feed, der mir die Beiträge von FB-Freunden, an denen ich inhaltlich interessiert bin, priorisiert und zuverlässig liefert. Das klappt schon lange nicht mehr und wurde – bestenfalls – von Buster Keaton reels und videos verdrängt. Interessante Beiträge sehe ich nur noch erratisch oder wenn ich gezielt auf die Seiten dieser FB-Freunde gehe und danach suche.
Facebook Political Commentary Archive
Chronological English summaries organized by main political events
Built from the user-provided Facebook export ZIP
Source material available in the export: 2012-02-23 to 2026-03-04
—
Scope and method
The supplied export contains 14,125 post/comment records across the relevant Facebook activity files. After filtering for political and social-science commentary, 6,272 records remained for thematic analysis.
The event structure in this report is heuristic rather than official metadata. Records were grouped by date windows plus event keywords so that recurring commentary on the same crisis appears together. This works well for broad political trends, but a small number of edge cases may sit in a neighboring chapter.
The companion verbatim volume is deliberately narrower. It reproduces 1,201 substantive event-linked posts/comments in full and in the original language. Short acknowledgments, weakly event-linked remarks, and generic cross-cutting theory posts were not reproduced there in order to keep the document navigable.
Event map
| Event chapter | Date range in export | Records in analyzed corpus | Peak month |
| 2012-2013: Early social-science and governance commentary | 2013-03-18–2013-10-30 | 4 | 2013-08 |
| 2014-2015: Euromaidan, Crimea, Donbas, and the first Ukraine war | 2014-01-08–2015-11-30 | 103 | 2014-03 |
| 2015-2016: Europe’s refugee crisis, terrorism, and democratic strain | 2015-01-08–2016-12-19 | 126 | 2016-01 |
| 2016-2019: Brexit, EU fragility, and Europe’s illiberal turn | 2016-01-13–2019-12-31 | 411 | 2016-06 |
| 2016-2021: Trump, US polarization, and democratic backsliding | 2016-01-24–2021-10-20 | 569 | 2016-11 |
| 2017-2023: Afghanistan, Taliban, and the failure of intervention | 2017-01-22–2023-12-22 | 243 | 2021-08 |
| 2018-2021: Russia, propaganda, Belarus, and authoritarian consolidation | 2018-01-09–2021-12-19 | 325 | 2019-06 |
| 2020-2021: COVID-19, lockdowns, and pandemic governance | 2020-02-29–2021-12-16 | 56 | 2021-03 |
| 2022-2024: Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the European security order | 2022-01-02–2024-12-30 | 1,182 | 2022-03 |
| 2023-2025: Israel-Gaza, Iran, and wider Middle East escalation | 2023-02-23–2025-12-04 | 144 | 2023-10 |
| 2024: EU elections, Georgian politics, and illiberal alliances | 2024-01-10–2024-12-21 | 73 | 2024-11 |
| 2025-2026: Trump’s return, transatlantic rupture, and pressure on Ukraine | 2025-01-05–2026-03-04 | 618 | 2025-05 |
| 2019-2026: China, Taiwan, Iran, and wider geopolitical realignment | 2019-02-04–2026-03-03 | 128 | 2021-09 |
| Other political and social-theory commentary | 2012-02-23–2026-03-04 | 2,290 | 2017-05 |
2012-2013: Early social-science and governance commentary
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 4 records | Date range: 2013-03-18 to 2013-10-30 | Peak month: 2013-08
The earliest material in the export is already strongly analytical. Your comments revolve around state capacity, the partial outsourcing of force, intervention logic, and the conditions under which political order collapses or survives. Afghanistan appears early as a reference case for legitimacy, pacification, and institutional weakness rather than as a simple story of chaos.
A second early thread is comparative state-building in the post-Soviet space. In your Georgia comments you weigh Shevardnadze, Saakashvili, and Ivanishvili in terms of output legitimacy, input legitimacy, corruption, and the survival of core state institutions. Even at this early stage, the archive shows a recurring habit of comparing cases rather than moralizing them in isolation.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: political, afghanistan, peace, state, western, military, intervention, saakashvili.
2014-2015: Euromaidan, Crimea, Donbas, and the first Ukraine war
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 103 records | Date range: 2014-01-08 to 2015-11-30 | Peak month: 2014-03
Your 2014–2015 commentary treats Russia’s moves in Crimea and eastern Ukraine as both aggressive and revealing of structural weakness. A recurring argument is that Moscow resorts to force when it cannot secure its interests through attractive institutions, and that this weakness is dangerous precisely because it pushes the Kremlin toward risky escalation.
You repeatedly distinguish between Crimea, where you initially expected coercive control without large-scale bloodshed, and eastern Ukrainian cities, where you saw the greater danger of spiraling violence. NATO, EU association, and Russia’s own red lines appear throughout the chapter, but your position is not that the West caused the conflict; rather, you stress that poor European timing and weak strategy intersected with an increasingly arbitrary Kremlin.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: russia, russian, political, ukraine, putin, really, what, mit.
2015-2016: Europe’s refugee crisis, terrorism, and democratic strain
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 126 records | Date range: 2015-01-08 to 2016-12-19 | Peak month: 2016-01
In this phase you reject panic narratives about Europe being ‘overrun’ by refugees. The more consistent line in your posts is that the crisis is one of institutional speed, coordination, and political quality, not simply one of numbers. You are critical of anti-migrant populism, but also of moralizing responses that avoid discussing governance capacity and social trust.
The material around Cologne, terrorism, and Syria shows the same pattern: strong concern about violence and public order, paired with insistence that incidents not be turned into civilizational myths or excuses for collective stigmatization. Europe’s democratic resilience, in your account, depends on not letting fear become the organizing principle of politics.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: mit, als, flüchtlinge, für, auf, dass, state, sich.
2016-2019: Brexit, EU fragility, and Europe’s illiberal turn
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 411 records | Date range: 2016-01-13 to 2019-12-31 | Peak month: 2016-06
Brexit appears in your archive less as a one-off British error than as a symptom of a wider European crisis of representation, elite irresponsibility, imperial nostalgia, and emotional politics. You regularly return to the inability of major British figures to articulate the common good, and you read the referendum aftermath as a lesson in what happens when political classes live off ambiguity for too long.
At the same time, your attention broadens beyond Britain to a larger European pattern: nationalist coalitions, anti-liberal rhetoric, and the difficulty of defending supranational institutions when they are experienced as distant. The chapter repeatedly links Brexit to the wider illiberal turn in Poland, Hungary, Spain/Catalonia, and the broader contest over how much democratic disorder a system can survive.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: europe, european, brexit, britain, political, russia, trump, like.
2016-2021: Trump, US polarization, and democratic backsliding
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 569 records | Date range: 2016-01-24 to 2021-10-20 | Peak month: 2016-11
From the 2016 campaign onward, you frame Trump less as an eccentric anomaly than as a carrier of a deeper crisis inside liberal democracy. The recurring themes are minority rule, institutional corrosion, nationalism as political theater, and the danger posed by a Republican Party willing to protect power rather than constitutional order.
This line sharpens dramatically in 2020. Your posts and comments repeatedly warn that electoral subversion is being attempted in public, not in secret: through state legislatures, court theatrics, disinformation, and the normalization of baseless fraud claims. Even when you emphasize Trump’s incompetence, the larger concern is that institutions only survive if enough actors choose to defend them.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: trump, president, what, who, said, there, russia, political.
2017-2023: Afghanistan, Taliban, and the failure of intervention
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 243 records | Date range: 2017-01-22 to 2023-12-22 | Peak month: 2021-08
This is one of the most consistently analytical bodies of material in the archive. Rather than treating Afghanistan through a simple success/failure lens, your posts focus on legitimacy, center–periphery bargaining, Pakistani and Russian roles, the Taliban’s social distance from contemporary Afghan society, and the consequences of bypassing the Kabul government in negotiations.
The 2021 collapse produces some of your clearest synthetic commentary. You argue that the Afghan state was mistrusted but not broadly hated, that the army’s refusal to fight was a leadership catastrophe, and that Ghani’s centralizing technocratic model alienated many constituencies. Your summaries repeatedly stress that people may accept takeover to avoid destruction, even when they do not believe the victors can govern well.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: taliban, afghanistan, afghan, government, said, what, one, there.
2018-2021: Russia, propaganda, Belarus, and authoritarian consolidation
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 325 records | Date range: 2018-01-09 to 2021-12-19 | Peak month: 2019-06
Across these years you return to the mechanics of authoritarian durability: propaganda that does not need to hypnotize everyone, patronage networks that reward compliance, and informal or deniable force that lets the state outperform more constrained democratic systems. Russia is often treated as an adaptive but brittle regime rather than a coherent strategic superpower.
Belarus, Navalny-era repression, the South Caucasus, and information operations all appear in this frame. One of the core ideas running through the chapter is that authoritarian systems can look strong while actually living off institutional distortion, opportunism, and the managed degradation of political life.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: russia, russian, putin, there, said, political, power, what.
2020-2021: COVID-19, lockdowns, and pandemic governance
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 56 records | Date range: 2020-02-29 to 2021-12-16 | Peak month: 2021-03
Your pandemic commentary is notable for being less moralizing than procedural. You repeatedly question weak evidence, shaky claims about immunity, and simplistic international comparisons, while also resisting anti-institutional overreaction. The archive shows sustained interest in representative sampling, antibody testing, superspreading, communication quality, and the difference between symbolic and effective measures.
Sweden and Germany appear often as comparative cases, but the deeper theme is governance under uncertainty. You are skeptical of performative certainty from any side and consistently argue that democratic credibility depends on proportional action, transparent reasoning, and an ability to revise claims when the data change.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: people, virus, pandemic, sweden, government, said, there, still.
2022-2024: Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the European security order
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 1,182 records | Date range: 2022-01-02 to 2024-12-30 | Peak month: 2022-03
This is by far the largest single chapter in the archive. From early 2022 onward your commentary becomes denser, more frequent, and much more unequivocal: the war is a Russian war of aggression, Ukrainian resistance is politically and morally decisive, and European security can no longer be organized around illusions about Kremlin restraint.
Several subthemes recur again and again: the importance of Western unity, the need for arms and political clarity rather than appeasement, the ideological nature of Russian revanchism, and the danger of treating Ukrainian surrender as realism. German debates, Steinmeier-era accommodation, Russian propaganda, mobilization limits, and long-war scenarios all receive sustained attention. The sharpest concentration of material falls in February–October 2022, but the argument continues across 2023 and 2024.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: russia, ukraine, putin, russian, there, nato, what, said.
2023-2025: Israel-Gaza, Iran, and wider Middle East escalation
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 144 records | Date range: 2023-02-23 to 2025-12-04 | Peak month: 2023-10
Your commentary on Israel, Gaza, Hamas, and Iran is marked by concern about chain reactions: military escalation, rhetorical absolutism, and the way regional wars are quickly folded into wider Western political conflicts. The archive does not read as one-sided advocacy for a camp so much as a sustained effort to understand strategic consequences, especially when moral language starts replacing analysis.
Iran appears both in the context of regional confrontation and as part of a broader discussion about how authoritarian and ideological regimes invite catastrophic overreach. The largest spike comes in October and November 2023, but the theme returns later as the war reshapes debates about security, legitimacy, and the limits of solidarity politics.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: israel, hamas, iran, what, gaza, people, israeli, trump.
2024: EU elections, Georgian politics, and illiberal alliances
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 73 records | Date range: 2024-01-10 to 2024-12-21 | Peak month: 2024-11
The 2024 material tracks democratic erosion inside Europe itself. You focus on the difficulty of repairing institutions once ruling parties have fully politicized them, on the growth of transnational illiberal alliances, and on the danger of underestimating how quickly slow decay can turn into visible breakdown.
Georgia becomes a particularly important case study. Your posts and comments treat it as a test of European credibility, election integrity, and the relationship between domestic power games and geopolitical alignment. The same concerns spill into commentary on the EU elections and the wider normalization of far-right cooperation.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: political, georgia, like, there, european, what, party, election.
2025-2026: Trump’s return, transatlantic rupture, and pressure on Ukraine
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 618 records | Date range: 2025-01-05 to 2026-03-04 | Peak month: 2025-05
The final chapter is the second major peak of the archive after 2022. Here your focus shifts from Russia alone to the interaction between Trump’s return, oligarchic capture inside the United States, transatlantic unreliability, and mounting pressure on Ukraine to accept an imposed settlement. Europe is no longer treated as sheltered by ‘the West’ but as a political actor forced to think strategically on its own.
The tone of these posts is often more alarmed and more synthetic than earlier US commentary. Recurrent ideas include the hollowing out of constitutional restraints, the transactional treatment of allies, the risk of turning Russian aggression into a negotiated reward, and the possibility that violence rather than shared norms becomes the main organizing principle of international order.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: trump, ukraine, russia, europe, what, there, only, one.
2019-2026: China, Taiwan, Iran, and wider geopolitical realignment
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 128 records | Date range: 2019-02-04 to 2026-03-03 | Peak month: 2021-09
A smaller but persistent line of commentary addresses the shift toward a more openly multipolar and coercive international order. China, Taiwan, Xinjiang, Iran, and strategic competition appear as connected cases in which power projection, surveillance, ideological discipline, and Western distraction reinforce each other.
Even when these posts are fewer in number, they matter because they widen the frame of the archive. They show that your political commentary is not only event-reactive; it is also concerned with longer-term structural changes in global order, including how authoritarian powers learn from one another and exploit democratic disorientation.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: china, chinese, iran, world, als, one, which, beijing.
Other political and social-theory commentary
Coverage in analyzed corpus: 2,290 records | Date range: 2012-02-23 to 2026-03-04 | Peak month: 2017-05
A large remainder of the corpus does not map neatly onto a single event chapter. It includes commentary on democratic theory, public discourse, universities, culture-war conflicts, media ecosystems, political language, and comparative reflections that cut across several countries and crises.
This material is analytically important because it provides the conceptual glue of the archive: questions of legitimacy, elite failure, institutional trust, violence, representation, and the politics of emotion recur here in a less event-bound but often more explicit form.
Recurring terms in this chapter include: von, dass, mit, sich, für, auf, als, wie.
Notes
The export made available for this task does not actually reach two full decades. The earliest analyzable post/comment in the supplied files dates from 2012-02-23.
Some quoted Facebook titles remain in German because they come directly from the export metadata. The summaries themselves are written in English throughout.